Executive Search Insights

How Headhunters Work

Headhunting is a specialised part of the recruitment industry, focused on identifying and attracting talent for senior and challenging positions. But how does the industry actually work, what distinguishes headhunters from other recruiters, and how do different business models influence the way they operate?

Understanding the recruitment industry

Recruitment is a broad industry, with different types of recruiters serving different hiring needs. Broadly speaking, companies can recruit through their own in-house talent acquisition teams or engage external recruitment firms.

In-house recruitment

Many companies employ internal recruiters, commonly known as Talent Acquisition (TA) professionals, who are responsible for managing their hiring needs. Their work can include advertising vacancies, sourcing candidates, coordinating interviews and managing the recruitment process. Larger organisations may have substantial TA teams, while smaller businesses often rely on HR teams or hiring managers.

External recruitment agencies

External recruitment firms provide additional resources and expertise to help companies fill vacancies. There are two widely used commercial models: contingent recruitment and retained executive search.

Contingent recruitment is commonly used for a broad range of positions, particularly where there is a relatively accessible pool of candidates. Retained search is typically associated with senior leadership appointments, specialist positions and more challenging assignments, where a dedicated search is required.

Contingent Recruitment Retained Search
Engagement Often non-exclusive Typically exclusive
Payment Usually on successful placement Fee paid in agreed stages
Typical Roles Broad range of vacancies Senior or difficult-to-fill positions
Approach Often managing multiple assignments simultaneously Typically dedicating more time and resources to each assignment
Relationship Often more transactional Typically a closer client partnership

In many countries, no specific professional qualification or licence is required to become a headhunter. As a result, the experience, expertise and quality of service can vary considerably between firms. Choosing a headhunter therefore requires careful consideration. A firm's understanding of the relevant market, track record and approach to candidate research can be far more important than the label it uses to describe itself.

The different types of headhunting firms

The executive search industry includes a wide range of firms, from large international organisations to small specialist boutiques. Each has its own strengths, areas of expertise and ways of working.

At the larger end of the market are the so-called SHREK firms - Spencer Stuart, Heidrick & Struggles, Russell Reynolds Associates, Egon Zehnder and Korn Ferry. These global executive search businesses operate across multiple sectors and functions, with international networks and substantial research resources.

Smaller boutique firms tend to focus on particular industries, functions or geographical markets. Their specialisation can provide a detailed understanding of sector dynamics, individual businesses and the relevant leadership talent pool. For example, a technology-focused headhunter may have extensive experience recruiting executives across software, internet and app businesses.

Another important consideration is who will actually conduct the search. Particularly at larger executive search firms, the senior partner who wins a client assignment may not be the person conducting the research, approaching candidates or carrying out the initial assessments. Much of this work may be delegated to other members of the team.

Clients should also look carefully at a firm's track record. An impressive list of previous appointments may reflect the experience of the wider firm rather than the individuals assigned to their particular search. It is therefore important to understand who was personally responsible for those appointments, who will conduct the research and candidate assessments, and how the search team will be structured.

The real value of headhunters: attracting passive candidates

One of the fundamental challenges of recruitment is that the best person for a position may not be looking for a job. Advertising a vacancy on LinkedIn, a job board or a company's website primarily reaches people who are actively exploring new opportunities. For some roles, this approach works perfectly well. However, for senior positions or roles with a limited talent pool, relying solely on job applications is often not enough.

Successful executives are often valued by their employers. They may be well rewarded, have strong relationships within their organisations and enjoy considerable professional responsibility. Many have little reason to spend time browsing job advertisements, even if they might consider a good opportunity.

This is where headhunters play an important role. Rather than waiting for candidates to apply, they actively identify individuals who may have the right experience and approach them directly. Finding them is only part of the challenge. A successful headhunter must understand what could motivate someone to leave an attractive position, communicate the opportunity convincingly and establish enough trust for the candidate to consider a conversation.

The real value of headhunting therefore lies not simply in identifying people with the right job titles, but in reaching and engaging talented individuals who might otherwise never enter the recruitment process.

Can't in-house recruiters do the same job?

In principle, yes. Internal talent acquisition teams can identify potential candidates, approach them directly and manage a recruitment process. Many large companies employ experienced recruiters who are highly capable of conducting their own executive searches.

The challenge is often one of capacity and specialisation. Internal recruitment teams may be responsible for filling numerous vacancies across different departments, managing recruitment processes and supporting broader hiring operations. Conducting a comprehensive search for a particularly difficult senior appointment can require considerable time and attention.

Specialist headhunters offer a different perspective. While an internal recruiter naturally develops a detailed understanding of their own organisation, a sector-focused headhunter spends much of their career studying the wider industry. They develop knowledge of competing businesses, organisational structures, leadership teams and the movement of talent between companies. They understand that a Chief Product Officer at one company may have very different responsibilities from someone with the same title elsewhere, and that relevant candidates may sometimes be found in adjacent industries.

Headhunters also develop professional relationships across their chosen markets. These networks can help them identify potential candidates, understand their reputations and assess experience beyond what is immediately apparent from a CV or LinkedIn profile.

How headhunters get paid

Recruitment firms are paid by the companies that hire them, rather than by the candidates they recruit. However, the way fees are structured can vary significantly, and these differences have important implications for both clients and recruiters.

Contingent recruitment vs retained search

Under a contingent recruitment agreement, an agency is generally paid only when a candidate it introduces is successfully hired. This is often described as a "no hire, no fee" arrangement. From the client's perspective, this can be attractive. There is usually no upfront financial commitment, and companies can work with several agencies simultaneously, creating competition between recruiters.

However, contingent recruitment also introduces financial risk for the recruiter. An agency might spend considerable time identifying, approaching and interviewing candidates, only for the client to cancel the vacancy, hire someone through another agency or decide not to recruit at all. In these circumstances, the agency may receive no payment for its work. This commercial reality can influence how contingent recruiters operate. Many work across a relatively large number of vacancies at once, balancing their time according to the likelihood of making a successful placement. Difficult or uncertain assignments may consequently receive less attention.

Working with multiple agencies can also create complications for clients. Different firms may introduce the same candidate, potentially leading to disputes over which agency is entitled to the placement fee. Managing several agencies also requires additional time from the client's HR team, which must coordinate candidate submissions, communication and feedback.

Retained search operates differently. The client commits to paying an agreed fee, usually in stages, with an initial retainer paid when the assignment begins. This provides the search firm with greater financial certainty and allows it to dedicate resources to a thorough research and recruitment process.

Retained search is particularly common for senior executive appointments and positions that are difficult to fill. The relationship between the client and the headhunter is also typically more collaborative, with the headhunter working closely with the client throughout the search, from defining the brief and conducting market research to assessing candidates and managing the appointment process.

Both models have their advantages and disadvantages. However, retained search, particularly through an exclusive agreement with a single headhunting firm, generally offers a more structured and manageable process. With clear responsibilities, dedicated resources and a closer working relationship, it can provide greater reliability, especially for senior appointments and roles that are critical to the business.

Percentage-Based Fees vs Fixed Fees

Headhunting fees are commonly calculated as a percentage of the successful candidate's agreed remuneration, although some firms charge a fixed fee for an assignment. The precise calculation depends on the contract, including which elements of compensation are included.

Percentage-based fees are widely used across the recruitment industry, but they can create an interesting potential conflict of interest. A client may want to control the salary offered to a candidate, while a headhunter whose fee increases with remuneration has a financial incentive, at least in theory, for the eventual salary to be higher.

A fixed-fee arrangement removes this particular incentive. The fee is agreed independently of the candidate's eventual salary, making the cost of the assignment clearer from the outset.

Both approaches can work well. What matters is that clients understand how their headhunter is compensated, what services are included and whether the commercial structure supports the objectives of the search.

Choosing the right headhunter

Headhunting is not simply about finding candidates. It requires an understanding of the market, the ability to engage people who are not actively looking for a new role, and the judgement to assess which individuals are genuinely suited to an organisation.

The quality of headhunting firms varies considerably, making it important for companies to look beyond brand names and fee structures. Sector expertise, research capability, professional judgement and a clear understanding of the client's needs are all important considerations.

Ultimately, choosing the right headhunter means finding a partner who understands your business and can access the talent needed to help it succeed.

Contact us to discuss how Neon River can support your executive hiring needs.

Discover More